In general, I find I’m able to get away with more aggressive sharpening in Capture One, depending on the kind of image it is. Adobe’s Amount slider goes from 0 - 150, whereas Capture One's go from 0 - 1,000.
#LIGHTROOM 6 VS 5 SOFTWARE#
That challenging part about comparing Lightroom and Capture One is the companies that make the software have very different ideas about how sliders should scale. This is really just the highest I would set the Amount slider, lest the image starts taking on “false detail” and getting too “crunchy,” as we’ll see below. For another, this method of sharpening (high amount, lower detail) is widely regarded as sub-optimal.
For one thing, what is optimal to me, and what’s optimal to you may be entirely different. I’m making liberal use of the word “optimal” here. I don’t think this is actually chromatic aberration, since it does not appear rather it could be a byproduct of Adobe trying to improve transitions from blue areas to other colours. Lightroom 6.1 already appears to be slightly more aggressive with its sharpening of fine detail, however it appears to handle the removal of aberrations much less well. Pay close attention to the brick, the roof tiles, and wrought iron detailing on the rooftop towards the left of the frame. Perhaps of note is that despite it now being relatively common knowledge that Adobe Camera Raw performs better with RAFs when we make liberal use of the Detail slider, the defaults remain the same with both Amount and Detail set to 25. 6.1 for X-Trans Best X-Trans RAW Converter Long Exposure Photography Tips Heavy Issues Mirrorless vs DSLR weight Adobe’s Fujifilm Camera Calibration Profiles Film Simulation Modes Compared Fujifilm Metering ONA Bowery vs.